Grab Your Dick and Double Click
19 July 2010
I watch online porn like it’s my job. In fact, it is my job, believe it or not. I work as a consultant for a technology company, and my professional responsibilities include rating adult websites for their relevance to search terms. So, for example, if someone types in “hot librarians naked” (an actual search term that recently led to this blog, according to the ever-helpful Google Analytics), I would look carefully at the sites returned by the search engine to determine if they contained librarians of suitable hotness and nakedness to (ahem) satisfy the searcher. (Obviously, this blog is not a good match for that search term – at least not yet. You never know what the future might hold, dear readers . . . )
In the past few weeks alone, I’ve spent upwards of 30 hours looking at pornographic materials. This is not as fun as it sounds. I’ve seen some things that I can never unsee (beloved Disney characters in incestuous embraces, several instances of the “Two Girls, One Cup” video, and a seriously disturbing act involving a live octopus). But overall, I remain, as I was before I took on this project, a feminist woman in favor of porn.
Because I felt like I just wasn’t getting enough porn at work (ha), I decide to do some reading about the state of porn in our culture today, in preparation for this very blog post. I decided to read two pro-porn books and two anti-porn books, in the interest of fairness. On the pro side: Good Porn: A Woman’s Guide by Erika Lust (a birthday present from my partner, because he knows me so well) and The Smart Girl’s Guide to Porn by Violet Blue. And on the con side: Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity by Robert Jensen, and Pornified: How Pornography is Damaging Our Lives, Our Relationships, and Our Families by Pamela Paul.
It should come as no surprise that I really enjoyed the Blue and Lust books, while I wanted to throw the Jensen and Paul books across the room (or out the window, or off of a really big cliff). I do agree with them about a few things: for one, that pornography addiction is real, and it can cause serious damage to relationships (as can, of course, any addiction or compulsive behavior). I also agree that most mainstream porn is indeed extremely misogynistic. But do you know what I find even more demeaning to women? Anti-porn crusaders’ tired gender essentialism arguments.
Paul, in particular, is a student of the Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus school of logical fallacy. While she admits that some women do watch and purport to enjoy pornography, she tries to explain this away with some truly maddening gender stereotypes. Women who watch porn, she argues, just do it to appease the men in their lives; they want to come across as cool and sexually free, not “uptight” or “prudish,” so they force themselves to tolerate pornography. Or perhaps they do actually enjoy adult entertainment, but not the same content that men are turned on by. ”When they refer to adult material,” Paul says, “women are often talking about erotica.” ”True male-oriented pornography,” she writes, “still offends the vast majority of women.” (Maybe so, but not the women I know.) Paul also supposes that pro-porn women are just ignorant of the really hardcore pornographic content that’s out there. ”In all likelihood, many of those who suggest that pornography is about sexual liberation have probably not seen the kind of pornography that many, perhaps most, men find alluring.”
Lady, let me tell you: I’ve seen it. I’ve seen it all. I’d bet good money that I’ve seen more pornography than Pamela Paul, and even some teenage boys. And there are a few things I’d like to get off my chest:
1. All men have watched, will watch, or perhaps even at this very moment are watching porn. There are, of course, some men who are just not that into pornography, but if you meet a guy who says he has never watched porn, he’s a liar. I don’t have any scientific proof of this, but since Robert Jensen and Pamela Paul got entire books published without scientific proof for their ideas, I feel relatively okay going out on a limb here.
2. Many women also watch porn, and not for the bullshit reasons that Pamela Paul cites. This pretty much says it all:
3. Though the mainstream porn industry gets a lot of flack for promoting only a cookie-cutter, Bleach and Breast Implant Barbie image of female attractiveness, modern pornography as a whole has made room for a vast assortment of different types of women (and men), depicting diverse ideas of beauty and sexual desire. Pornography is one of the few contemporary entertainment mediums that honestly offers something for every taste and proclivity. It’s not perfect, of course, but I think there’s something nice about seeing a plethora of body types represented, praised – and, yes, fetishized.
4. Porn is to sex as romance novels are to love: completely unrealistic fantasy worlds – fun to visit, but not where you want to live. The problem is not with the fantasy itself, though, but with people who fail to differentiate between it and reality. In the case of porn, comprehensive sex education can help with this, by showing people from a young age what “ordinary” sex looks like and how real women respond sexually (hint: not like Jenna Jameson).
5. Everyone deserves a private, individual sex life. I firmly believe that your sexuality is about who you are, not just what you do with other people. Both Paul and Jensen bemoan pornography viewing as something selfish, a tactic that men use as an escape from dealing with the complex needs of their real-life female partners. And I say: yeah, so what? Who says that sexual expression always has to be about selflessness and sharing and connecting? Especially when it comes to solo sex (which everyone has a right to, whether in or out of a relationship), selfishness and indulgence are kind of the point. As someone in a monogamous relationship, I like to think of this as being physically faithful, but mentally slutty (in a good way). You can’t police the thoughts and fantasies of your significant other, and I don’t know why people try. Besides, even if your partner doesn’t have a porn habit, that doesn’t mean he or she is thinking of you and only you 24\7 – and it’s unrealistic (not to mention unhealthy) to expect that.
Thus endeth my Pornifesto. I’m feeling a bit over-saturated on the subject of porn at the moment, but if anyone has suggestions for other books I should check out on the topic (for or against), leave them in the comments.




Comments
yes i have a book i can recomend to yuo it is THE BIBLE
Realtalk: I’ve enjoyed your blog for quite some time and never really had anything to say in comments. I still don’t, but I wanted to let you know that I think you’re a superb thinker and writer, and you should keep it up.
It only figures that I comment on a porn post.
I’ve read the Paul book, and it actually kind of helped me come to terms with the fact that I don’t really like porn or respond to it, and that I really WAS sort of just going along with it because I thought everyone would think I was a huge prude if I didn’t like it. So there’s that. Plenty of stuff she said annoyed me as well.
Have you read “Parenting, Inc” by Paul? I liked it way better than “Pornified” because I was way more on Paul’s side of the argument. Which probably means it’s full of strawmen and other logical fallacies because I was too busy yelling, “Yes! Your children don’t need all that crap!” to notice them.
Lucas – Thanks!
Anna – I have read Parenting, Inc., and I want to read The Starter Marriage as well. I think I too may have overlooked some logical fallacies in Parenting, Inc. because I agreed so wholeheartedly with its premise. Also, I think the baby industrial complex is generally less controversial than porn – but maybe that’s just because I’m not a parent.
I totally understand that some people, women and men both, just don’t enjoy porn, for completely legit reasons – and side note: I don’t think you’re a prude.
I just hate the arguments typically used by anti-porn writers. It’s almost always all about gender stereotypes (Men are sex-obsessed perverts! Women have dainty little lady brains that can’t handle pornography!), rather than about people as individuals who happen to have diverse sexual interests.
I’ve never read the book myself, only heard of it, and from what I’ve heard, your jaw will likely drop reading it. It’s called “Pornland”, by Gail Dines. I can guarantee you will be offended by it.
I’ve been hearing a lot about the author of this book, and even heard some speeches by her. This woman started a group called “Stop Porn Culture”, and she treats pornography as one big body, and doesn’t even begin to look at the broad spectrum of what types of porn exist, from the beautiful to the downright nasty. She also talks about how porn makes men into rapists & child molesters. Her arguments seem to be littered with Misandry. But, you NEED to do a review of this book, it’s begging for critical analysis.
Really interesting piece. I haven’t read Erika Lust’s books, but her movies are some of my favorites and she’s a really smart lady.
If you’re interested in reading more, you might want to check out
Pornology by Ayn Carrillo-Gailey and Naked Ambition: Women Who Are Changing Pornography by Carly Milne.
The first is a light read, but interesting just the same and the second is one I recommend all the time and includes pieces by a number of brilliant perverts like Nina Hartley and Tristan Taormino.
Thanks for the recommendations! I’ll be sure to check those out. Sounds like this post might require a Part 2 . . .
Right on. A couple of other books I’d recommend on the pro side are Carol Vance’s “Pleasure & Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality,” which is actually a collection of essays contributed by various pro-sex/pro-porn feminists. It’s often academic, but some of the essays are extremely powerful. Nadine Strossen’s “Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex and the Fight for Women’s Rights” is an unapologetic defense of porn from various perspectives (legal, sexual, feminist, socio-economic, etc.). Of course, Carol Queen and Susie Bright have written tons in defense of porn, and Carol Queen may have written the hottest “porn” novel ever, “The Leather Daddy and the Femme.” It goes from zero to sixty in the first few pages, and is erotica/porn from a decidedly queer, pansexual perspective. And it’s hot as hell.
Erika Lust is a hero of mine and is one of a growing number of smart, young, feminist women inserting themselves into mainstream porn with great results. Also check out the films of Anna Span, the UK’s answer (sort of) to Erika.
Nice comment!
http://sexxytokyo.com
This article was pretty good I guess, but it seems like you’re perpetrating the same sexism that you criticize in your opponents. On the one hand you say that ALL men have watched porn are or will watch it, but then in the very next paragraph you say essentially that eh some women watch porn and some don’t. You kind of make it out like it’s mandated by nature that men watch porn but for women it isn’t. It seems as though you’re just using cultural memes you’ve heard before rather than thinking about the situation with actual nuance.
But this is just my interpretation of the text, not an interpretation of you ideas I would hope. It was good article though.